Mentioned in This Article
1. Why Wall Street tokenization is being framed as an opportunity
Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo and Morgan Stanley each described tokenization as a source of growth rather than a danger to their businesses during third-quarter earnings calls held this week, with executives pointing to trading, cross-border payments and wealth advice respectively. None of the banks attached a revenue figure to the opportunity, and one chief executive described current activity as small.
Tokenization means representing financial or real-world assets, such as stocks, bonds, funds and commodities, as digital tokens on a blockchain. A growing number of firms now offer or plan tokenized versions of those instruments, which can trade around the clock and with fewer geographic limits than conventional markets.
The comments matter because large banks sit at the center of the financial system that tokenization could change. Their views indicate whether the incumbents expect to be displaced by the technology or to absorb it. The three firms chose the second reading, and each tied it to the part of its business that it considers most relevant.
2. Could tokenization and DeFi erode Goldman's trading revenue?
Goldman Sachs chief executive David Solomon was asked on Tuesday's analyst call whether tokenization, decentralized finance and prediction markets might eat into the firm's trading revenue. He suggested the opposite: that these developments could widen what the bank does rather than shrink it.
To make the case, Solomon pointed to the shift to electronic stock trading roughly 50 years ago. That change also raised fears among trading desks, yet Goldman adapted and its equities business grew. In his view, tokenization could follow a similar path, a comparison that casts the technology as a new market structure to be adopted rather than a competitor.
He told analysts that the developments create more products, more activity, potentially new clients and broader distribution channels. The argument rests on volume: if assets become easier to create, move and trade, a firm with a large trading franchise may have more to intermediate, not less.
Solomon was also careful about timing. He said tokenization could lower costs, automate transactions and make assets easier to trade, but he cautioned that activity today is small and at the margin. That candor is a useful reminder that the strategic enthusiasm outpaces present-day volumes.
3. What has Goldman built for tokenized assets?
Goldman has spent years on digital-asset infrastructure, though with less publicity than several rivals. It built its own tokenized-asset platform, known as GS DAP, as early as 2022, and it has worked on tokenizing bonds, money market funds and real estate.
In July, the bank took part in a half-day run of a tokenization service from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation. The DTCC handles much of the plumbing for U.S. securities markets, processing quadrillions of dollars in transactions each year, so a test of its service carries weight beyond a single institution's pilot.
Goldman is now looking to use the DTCC service at a larger scale. Clearing and settlement are the stages after a trade is agreed, when ownership and payment actually change hands, and they are where tokenization promises some of its largest efficiency gains. A clearing utility that supports tokenized assets would allow banks to test the technology inside the existing market framework instead of building parallel systems.
4. How is Wells Fargo using tokenized deposits?
Wells Fargo already uses tokenized deposits for cross-border payments, and funds reach beneficiary accounts in two minutes or less. A tokenized deposit is a bank deposit recorded on a blockchain-style ledger, so it remains a claim on the bank while moving with the speed of a digital token.
Chief financial officer Michael Santomassimo said the service is in production, although volume is still low. That puts the bank a step beyond a pilot, with a live product that customers can use, even if the scale remains modest.
The geographic angle is what makes the product strategically interesting. Wells Fargo lacks a large international branch network, unlike some global rivals. Santomassimo said tokenized deposits could help it win more cross-border business without having to build one, using technology in place of physical presence.
The bank is also considering tokenized securities, real-world assets and crypto trading for wealth clients. Santomassimo gave no timeline for any of them, so those remain options under review and not announced products.
5. Where does Morgan Stanley see tokenization fitting in?
Morgan Stanley framed the technology as less about moving money and more about what happens when assets can move with fewer delays. Chief financial officer Sharon Yeshaya said faster, easier asset transfers will not eliminate the need for advice.
That view positions tokenization as a service layer beneath a relationship business. Clients who hold a wider range of assets, and who can shift between them more quickly, may need more guidance on what to hold and why. For a firm whose wealth-management arm depends on advisers, greater choice can mean greater demand for their judgment.
The bank has invested in digital capabilities across wealth management and institutional securities. Yeshaya announced no new product, and she presented tokenization as another opportunity for the firm instead of a change that requires a new strategy.
6. Three banks, three different angles
Taken together, the remarks show how differently large banks can read the same technology. Goldman is looking at trading and market structure, Wells Fargo at payments and reach, and Morgan Stanley at advice and client demand. Each has taken the version of tokenization that reinforces what it already does well.
The shared message is more important than the differences. None of the three described tokenization as a threat to its core franchise, and none presented it as a source of near-term revenue. That combination of confidence and caution suggests that executives view the technology as a long-term infrastructure shift to be approached gradually.
The earnings calls also come as other developments move in the same direction. Securitize has put equities on Solana, BNY and Citadel Securities have tested tokenized Treasuries, and tokenized commodities have drawn attention. The banks' comments extend that trend from crypto-native firms into the largest institutions in traditional finance.
7. What is the difference between tokenized assets and tokenized deposits?
The two terms are often confused, but they describe different things. A tokenized asset is a digital representation of an existing investment, such as a share, a bond or a fund unit, recorded on a blockchain so that ownership can be transferred electronically. A tokenized deposit is a representation of money held at a bank, and it remains a liability of that bank.
The distinction matters for risk and regulation. Tokenized securities are subject to the rules that govern the underlying instruments, while tokenized deposits sit inside the banking system and are treated as deposits. Both can move on shared digital ledgers, which is why banks regard them as complementary parts of one infrastructure rather than competing products.
It also explains why the three banks emphasized different uses. A firm with a large trading business naturally looks first at tokenized securities, while a firm that wants to move money across borders looks at deposits. A firm that advises wealthy clients looks at both, because each widens the range of holdings it can discuss.
8. Why do clearing and settlement matter for the technology?
When a trade is agreed, a series of back-office steps must follow before the buyer actually owns the asset and the seller actually has the cash. In many markets this process takes a day or more and involves several intermediaries, each holding its own record of who owns what.
Tokenization aims to shorten that chain by placing ownership and payment on a shared ledger. If the two can be exchanged at the same moment, counterparties spend less time exposed to each other and less capital sits idle while waiting for settlement. Supporters argue that this could lower costs and reduce errors from reconciling separate records.
This is the context in which Goldman's participation in a clearing-utility test stands out. The value of the technology depends on the institutions that already run the market accepting it, and a test involving one of the central utilities of U.S. securities markets is a step in that direction. Even so, a half-day run is a demonstration and not a production system, and the bank itself describes current activity as small.
9. What to watch next
Investors should also keep the timing of these remarks in view. They were made on earnings calls, where executives address analysts who ask about threats to profit, so the framing is partly a response to that scrutiny. The absence of revenue figures means analysts cannot yet measure the contribution, and the three banks have not suggested that tokenization will change their reported results in the near term.
The key indicators will be volumes and disclosure. Executives have so far kept their comments qualitative, and the first time a bank attaches a revenue figure or a transaction count to tokenized products will be a meaningful signal about how quickly the business is growing.
Goldman's plan to run the DTCC service at a larger scale is the most concrete next step mentioned, while Wells Fargo's consideration of tokenized securities and crypto trading for wealth clients is still without a date. Updates on these are likely to arrive in future earnings calls or product announcements.
For now, the message from the three banks is consistent: tokenization is something to build on. Whether that confidence is rewarded depends on how much activity eventually moves onto tokenized rails, which the executives themselves acknowledge is still small.