Analysis•

Americans Own Just 10.5% of Tokenized Treasuries, as Italy, Portugal and Singapore Hold Two-Thirds

Chainalysis finds Italy, Portugal and Singapore held 66.9% of geolocated tokenized US Treasury value on July 1, 2026, against 10.5% for Americans, in a $15.42 billion market.

Written By :MINRK
Americans Own Just 10.5% of Tokenized Treasuries, as Italy, Portugal and Singapore Hold Two-Thirds

Image by U.S. Government. The original 1780s seal is believed to have been designed by Fr via Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)

1. Who holds tokenized US Treasuries today?

Investors in Italy, Portugal and Singapore together held 66.9% of the geolocated value of tokenized US Treasuries as of July 1, 2026, according to Chainalysis's 2026 North America report, while American holders accounted for only 10.5%. The market itself reached $15.42 billion, so the government that issues the underlying debt is largely absent from its on-chain version.

The distinction between issuer and owner is the heart of the finding. Treasury securities are obligations of the United States, and for decades their buyers have included domestic households, banks and funds alongside foreign central banks and investors. Once the same debt is wrapped in a blockchain token, the buyer base shifts, and Americans appear mostly as spectators rather than as the main participants.

One caveat shapes how the numbers should be read. The percentages describe geolocated value, meaning holdings that Chainalysis could tie to a country. They are not a full accounting of every wallet in the market, and they do not cover holdings whose location could not be determined. They are best understood as a map of identified buyers.

2. How is the on-chain holder base split by country?

Italy leads with 29.9% of geolocated value. Portugal follows with 18.8%, and Singapore is close behind at 18.2%. Added together, the three account for the 66.9% headline figure, which means that two European countries and one Asian financial hub control roughly two-thirds of the identified value.

The United States ranks fourth in the report at 10.5%. For a market built on American government debt, that is a modest share, and it is well below what the country's weight in global finance might suggest. The ranking does not mean American investors are shut out of Treasuries, which they can still buy through conventional channels, only that they are a minor presence in the tokenized version.

Japan presents a different pattern. Japanese holders make up 16.4% of geolocated holders by count, the largest share by number of wallets, yet they hold just 0.4% of total value. The gap points to many participants with small balances. Counting holders and counting value therefore tell two very different stories about who is using these products.

3. What is a tokenized Treasury?

A tokenized Treasury is a blockchain token that gives its holder exposure to US government debt. It works like a digital claim ticket for a bond: the token represents an economic interest in Treasury securities held by an issuer, and ownership is recorded on a distributed ledger rather than in a brokerage account.

Because the token can sit in an ordinary crypto wallet, it can move at any hour of any day. A position inside a traditional brokerage statement is tied to market hours and to the institution that holds it. A token can be transferred, pledged or held across borders without that institutional chain, which is the feature that attracts users who already operate on blockchain networks.

This is also why such tokens are often grouped under the label of real-world assets, or RWAs, a category covering traditional financial instruments brought onto blockchains. Treasuries are a natural first candidate because the underlying asset is regarded as low-risk, widely understood and easy to value, qualities that make the technology's experiment more straightforward than it would be with a complex or illiquid asset.

Holding the token is not identical to holding the bond directly. The holder relies on the issuer and on the structure that links the token to the securities behind it, so the quality of that arrangement, including custody, redemption terms and disclosure, matters as much as the yield. Investors weighing these products typically compare them with money market funds and with Treasury bills bought through a broker, considering fees, access hours and settlement speed.

4. How fast is the tokenized Treasury market growing?

Total value reached $15.42 billion, up 125% from $6.86 billion a year earlier. In other words, the market more than doubled within twelve months, and the growth was substantial enough that the overall pie, in the report's framing, is expanding quickly.

Rapid growth changes how the geographic split should be interpreted. A market that is doubling attracts new participants constantly, so the share held by any single country can shift quickly. A position that is dominant in July may look different in several months as new categories of buyers arrive, including institutions that have so far watched from the sidelines.

Scale also matters for context. A market of $15.42 billion is small beside the overall Treasury market, which is measured in trillions of dollars. The tokenized segment is better seen as an emerging channel through which the same debt is distributed than as a competitor to the established market, and its fast growth reflects a low starting base as much as strong demand.

Growth of this kind rarely moves in a straight line. Interest-rate expectations, the supply of government debt and the appetite for yield-bearing dollar assets all influence how much money flows into such products. The figures from July 1 capture a moment in that cycle, and the doubling over twelve months should be read as evidence of momentum rather than as a guarantee of continued expansion.

5. Why are foreign investors adding exposure?

Chainalysis points to two reasons for rising overseas interest. The first is that tokenization lowers minimum investment thresholds, allowing smaller sums to buy into an asset that has traditionally required larger commitments. The second is that investors outside the United States no longer need a US brokerage account to hold American government debt.

The second point is especially significant for non-American savers. Opening a brokerage account in another country can involve documentation, residency rules, tax forms and limits on which products a foreign client may purchase. A token that can be bought through a blockchain-based platform removes several of those steps, putting dollar-denominated, government-backed exposure within reach of people who previously faced obstacles.

There is a further logic that a well-informed reader would recognize. Many investors outside the United States want to hold dollar assets as a store of value or as a hedge against their own currencies. Tokenized Treasuries offer yield-bearing dollar exposure in a form that fits into crypto wallets, which helps explain why the holder base leans toward countries with active digital-asset communities and established financial centers.

Lower thresholds also change who can participate. Because tokens can usually be divided into small units, a saver with a modest balance can buy a fraction of the exposure that once required a larger ticket. That helps explain the Japanese pattern of many wallets with little value, and it suggests that retail users, not only institutions, form part of the audience for these instruments.

6. What does the lopsided ownership mean for US financial influence?

The concentration among foreign holders raises a question about where influence lies when a national asset is distributed through new rails. The dominance of overseas buyers highlights shifting global investment dynamics, since the demand for American debt on-chain is being supplied from abroad rather than at home.

For the United States, foreign demand for its debt is not new, and it is generally viewed as supportive because it helps finance government borrowing. A tokenized channel adds another path for that demand and makes it measurable in a way that private brokerage holdings often are not. Public blockchain data lets analysts such as Chainalysis observe wallet-level activity and estimate where holders are located, a level of visibility that traditional custody structures do not usually offer.

The data also hints at how adoption may spread. If overseas investors are first to use tokenized instruments, domestic uptake could depend on regulatory clarity, platform access and familiarity with digital wallets. Those factors are likely to determine whether the American share of 10.5% rises as the market matures or remains small.

Transparency cuts both ways. The same visibility that lets researchers estimate national shares also means that holder behavior on public networks can be studied closely, which may inform regulators weighing how to treat tokenized securities and the platforms that distribute them. How rules evolve in major jurisdictions will help decide how open or restricted the market remains for investors in different countries.

7. What should readers watch in the data next?

The July 1 snapshot is a single point in time, and the useful signals will come from how the figures move in later updates. Readers should watch whether Italy, Portugal and Singapore keep their combined 66.9% share, whether the American portion grows, and whether total value continues to rise from its current $15.42 billion.

They should also watch the relationship between holder counts and value. Japan's pattern of many small wallets and little total value could signal a growing retail base that may become more valuable as balances increase. Conversely, if the value in the leading countries comes from a small number of large holders, the market's geographic profile may be more sensitive to individual decisions than the percentages imply.

For now, the report offers a clear baseline: tokenized US Treasuries are a fast-growing market, owned mainly by investors outside the country that issues the debt, and held in positions whose sizes differ widely from one country to another.

Finally, because the shares are based on geolocated value, any change in the proportion of holdings that can be located will also affect the percentages. A rise in the identified portion could reshuffle the rankings without any change in real behavior, so careful readers will compare future reports against the same methodology before drawing conclusions about shifts in ownership.

Related Articles

NEWSLETTERS

Don't miss another story.

Subscribe to the MINRK Newsletter today.

Tick the newsletters you want. No selection? You'll get MINRK Headlines.

By signing up, you will receive emails about MINRK products and you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

MINRK Daybook

Market analysis for crypto traders and investors.

EVERY WEEKDAY

MINRK for Advisors

Defining crypto, digital assets and the future of finance for financial advisors.

EVERY THURSDAY

MINRK Protocol

Exploring the tech behind crypto one block at a time.

WEEKLY

MINRK Long & Short

A must read for institutions. Insights, news and analysis delivered weekly.

EVERY WEDNESDAY

MINRK Headlines

The biggest crypto news and ideas of the day.

EVERY WEEKDAY

MINRK Policy

Examining the intersection of cryptocurrency and government.

WEEKLY

MINRK Research

Join thousands of readers who rely on MINRK for data-driven insights on the latest digital asset trends.

MONTHLY