Mentioned in This Article
1. Tokenization news: Bullish's president puts issuers first
Stacey Cunningham, who led the New York Stock Exchange from 2018 to 2022 and became president of digital asset platform Bullish (BLSH) this week, said in an interview published on November 10 that stock tokenization has largely ignored the companies whose shares are involved. She argued that Bullish's planned purchase of transfer agent Equiniti, a deal of roughly $4.2 billion, positions it to change that.
Her central complaint is about who gets consulted. A great deal of what she called "synthetic" tokenization is taking place, Cunningham said, and the issuers of the underlying shares are not part of those conversations. She wants companies to take a more direct role in deciding how their stock is represented on a blockchain and how it trades once it is there.
The argument arrives at a moment when the gap between the industry's ambitions and corporate America's enthusiasm has become hard to overlook. Tokenization, the practice of recording ownership of an asset as a token on a blockchain, is one of the most discussed ideas on Wall Street. Yet the companies whose shares would be tokenized have been slow to embrace efforts launched without them.
2. Why are companies objecting to tokenized shares?
Many large companies have declined to have their stock included on new blockchain trading venues, and Cunningham's explanation is that they were never properly brought into the process. The clearest evidence is the tokenized-stock venue backed by crypto exchange OKX and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent of the NYSE. As of November 6, 56 of the 62 companies initially selected for that venue had objected.
Apple, Amazon and Tesla are among those that said no. An objection of this kind is not necessarily a verdict on the technology itself, and it does not mean these companies oppose tokenization in principle. What it does show is how difficult it is to assemble a market in tokenized equities when the issuers are not cooperating.
Public companies have reasons to be careful. A new trading venue can alter how their shares change hands and how they reach their investors, and those are matters boards and management teams prefer to control. The scale of the pushback against the OKX and ICE project suggests that persuading listed companies to join such markets will take more than a working product.
3. Not all tokenized stocks are the same
Part of the difficulty is that the label covers very different arrangements. Some tokenized-stock products give a buyer exposure to a share's price without conferring the full rights of ownership. A holder of such a token may track the gains and losses of the stock while having none of the standing of an actual shareholder.
Other designs keep those rights intact. The planned OKX and ICE venue falls into this second group: it preserves shareholder rights, while allowing companies to object to having their stock tokenized by a third party. That opt-out is the mechanism through which so many of the initially chosen companies registered their refusal.
The difference is more than technical. For an investor, it determines whether a token is a claim on a real share, with the rights attached to one, or simply an instrument that follows a price. For a company, it determines whether a parallel market in something resembling its stock can form without its consent, and whether the people holding those instruments count as its shareholders at all.
Cunningham's position sits apart from both. Her preference is for the company itself to be involved from the outset, so that tokenized shares are something an issuer chooses to offer and not something built around its stock by outsiders. That is the sense in which she describes much of today's activity as synthetic.
4. What the Equiniti acquisition would add
Bullish's plan is to build an issuer-focused platform by joining its existing exchange, custody and trading businesses with the shareholder recordkeeping that Equiniti provides. The acquisition is expected to close in January 2027, subject to regulatory approvals.
The prize is a set of existing corporate relationships. Equiniti works with nearly 3,000 corporate issuers and serves more than 20 million shareholders, and those ties would pass to Bullish on completion. For Cunningham, that is the point of the deal: it would let Bullish establish relationships with companies before their shares are tokenized, in contrast to launching products linked to stocks with no involvement from the issuer.
Transfer agents occupy a quiet but essential place in the equity market. They maintain the official record of who owns a company's shares. That function takes on added weight if companies begin issuing tokenized shares carrying the same legal and economic rights as conventional stock, because the token and the official ownership record then have to agree.
In a conventional setup these roles are spread across separate firms: one venue lists and trades the shares, another institution holds them in custody, and a transfer agent keeps the register. Bullish's bet is that putting the recordkeeper under the same roof as the trading and custody businesses gives an issuer a single counterparty for the entire life of a tokenized share, from issuance through to trading.
Cunningham summed up the resulting combination by saying Bullish has "all the puzzle pieces": an exchange, a transfer agent, a custodian, an AMM and indices. An AMM, or automated market maker, is software that enables trading by drawing on pools of assets, where a traditional exchange would match buyers and sellers through an order book.
5. Bullish has tested the technology on its own stock
The company has already run the experiment on itself. Earlier this year, Bullish tokenized its own shares on Solana (SOL). In October, at an event held at the NYSE, it demonstrated the transfer of 61 million reserved tokenized shares administered by Equiniti.
It has also been explicit that issuers will not be confined to a single network. Bullish has named Solana, Ethereum (ETH) and Aptos (APT) as the blockchains supporting its tokenization services, leaving companies to choose among them.
These steps establish that the technology functions when the shares in question are Bullish's own. Winning over outside issuers is a separate challenge, and a harder one. A company tokenizing its own stock answers to itself; convincing thousands of other boards to do the same requires a commercial case, not just a technical one.
6. What do companies gain from tokenization?
Cunningham's answer is that the benefit has to be something more substantial than trading around the clock. Extended hours are the feature most often advertised for tokenized stocks, but in her view that alone does not give an issuer sufficient reason to take part.
The more persuasive advantages lie in the mechanics of share ownership. Records kept on a blockchain could give a company a clearer picture of who holds its stock and make it easier to communicate with those shareholders. Faster settlement and simpler recordkeeping could reduce the administrative work that surrounds every share issue and transfer.
Those are back-office matters, far from the trading screens where tokenization is usually pitched, but they are the ones a corporate secretary or investor relations team deals with directly. Framing the offer around them is consistent with Cunningham's broader argument that the issuer, not the trader, is the customer who has to be convinced first.
None of this is assured. Whether those gains appear depends on how tokenized shares are structured and on whether the wider market adopts the infrastructure needed to support them. A tokenized share that few venues, brokers or investors can handle would deliver little of the promised efficiency.
7. A question of when, not whether
Having run the world's best-known stock exchange, Cunningham brings an insider's view of conventional market plumbing to a crypto-native company. She said she joined Bullish because she believes blockchain is moving beyond crypto trading and into the systems that underpin traditional markets.
She was unequivocal about the direction of travel. Parts of the technology could replace existing financial market infrastructure, she said, adding that this is already under way. In her words, the debate is no longer about whether assets will be tokenized but about how long it will take.
That conviction places her among the executives who regard tokenization as a destination for mainstream finance and not a side project of the crypto industry. Coming from a former head of the NYSE, it is also a statement about where an established market figure believes the infrastructure of equity trading is heading.
She does not expect the shift to come quickly, and the pace and the business models that will ultimately prevail remain uncertain. The objections lodged against the OKX and ICE venue are a reminder of how much persuasion still lies ahead before listed companies accept markets that could change how their shares trade.
8. What comes next for Bullish
The nearest milestone is the Equiniti closing, expected in January 2027 if regulators approve. Until then, the issuer relationships at the heart of Cunningham's strategy remain outside the company.
Legislation is not on her list of prerequisites. Asked about the stalled CLARITY Act, the comprehensive crypto market bill that Congress has not passed, Cunningham said existing rules leave room to build new infrastructure. There is a lot Bullish can do without the bill, she said, and she is not worried about it.
The task in front of Bullish is commercial: turning its technology, its trading infrastructure and its planned transfer-agent business into a service that companies actually want to use. Cunningham expects issuers to come on board once they understand what tokenization offers them, and said she is confident that adoption will be fast once they see the value.