Mentioned in This Article
1. Does the McRib really move the Bitcoin price?
No, according to analysts at CoinShares, GSR, Bitwise Europe and Blockworks, who say the McDonald's McRib sandwich has no demonstrable effect on Bitcoin (BTC). The claim resurfaced on October 27 as the sandwich returned to menus in some U.S. states, with traders on social media predicting a rally. Bitcoin was changing hands near $79,750, down about 6% over the previous month, when researchers rejected the idea.
The theory is a meme more than a market thesis, and the experts interviewed treat it that way. Their consensus is that any gains that follow a McRib launch are a coincidence, and that the many returns not followed by a rally are simply ignored by those who repeat the claim.
2. Where did the McRib theory come from?
The idea gained fresh momentum after a trader who posts as "internbrah" wrote on October 22 that Bitcoin has historically more than doubled after a McRib return. The post said the next return was scheduled for October 27 and carried a disclaimer. It was enough to push the sandwich back into crypto conversation as traders looked for any sign of a catalyst in a market that has moved sideways.
Such seasonal or cultural indicators are a familiar feature of retail trading. Fast-food menu items, movie releases and calendar dates are sometimes laid over price charts because the pattern is amusing, easy to remember and hard to disprove in a few anecdotes. Because Bitcoin has experienced large gains and large drawdowns over its history, almost any recurring date can be matched to a rally if the observer chooses the window carefully.
3. What does the data show?
Luke Nolan, a senior researcher at CoinShares, says there is no correlation at all. He argues that people who promote the idea leave out the McRib returns that do not fit the story. To test it, he compared the dates of U.S. McRib returns with Bitcoin's weekly closes in a chart produced by CoinShares.
The result was weak support for the claim. Only three of ten returns were followed by clearly positive Bitcoin returns, and Bitcoin frequently fell after a return. A signal that works in fewer than a third of cases offers little guidance to a trader, and it would not be considered reliable in any serious analysis.
A sample of ten events is also small. Even if a larger share of returns had been followed by gains, ten observations would not be enough to separate a real effect from luck, particularly in an asset whose weekly moves are large. That is another reason researchers regard the pattern as entertainment instead of a trading signal, and why the CoinShares comparison works best as a demonstration of how easily a neat story can fall apart when all the dates are counted.
Nolan added that if a sandwich really did signal a bull run, the relationship would be nonsensical, comparable to overlaying the release dates of the film Dune on a price chart. He described the theory as fun but purely coincidental.
4. Why do traders keep repeating it?
Carlos Guzman, vice president of research at the trading firm GSR, says no causal mechanism exists that could link a menu item to Bitcoin demand, and that any price increases that line up with a McRib launch are a funny coincidence. In his view, the community holds onto the idea because it is silly, absurd and amusing.
That explanation fits a broader pattern in crypto culture, where humor and in-jokes help hold communities together. A shared joke about a sandwich costs nothing to believe and gives traders something to discuss during quiet stretches. The experts cited here do not suggest the theory is dangerous, only that it should not be mistaken for analysis, and that nobody should size a position around it.
5. What is actually driving Bitcoin now?
André Dragosch, head of research at Bitwise Europe, describes the market as being in a wait-and-see mode. Traders appear reluctant to place large bets until they know what the Federal Reserve will do. The reason is the recent direction of policy and prices: the Fed raised interest rates in September for the first time since 2023, and the consumer price index rose 0.6% for the month that followed.
Higher rates tend to weigh on risk assets such as Bitcoin because they raise the return available from safer holdings and make borrowing more expensive. With inflation also firm, investors are wary of a further tightening, which helps explain why Bitcoin has had limited activity over the past month. The next Fed rate decision is due on Wednesday, October 28.
Seen against that backdrop, a sandwich is a poor candidate to explain what happens next. Interest-rate decisions, inflation readings and flows into investment products have a plain mechanism for affecting demand, which is why professional researchers watch them.
6. Which events could move the market next?
Jake Koch-Gallup, a senior research analyst at Blockworks, points to three catalysts over the next two weeks. The first is the Fed decision on Wednesday. The second is the expiry of about $11.69 billion in Bitcoin options on October 30, an event that can influence prices as traders adjust hedges and positions around the settlement date. The third is the U.S. midterm elections on November 3.
He said the previous week that the outcome of the Fed meeting would matter most. If the central bank holds rates and inflows into Bitcoin exchange-traded funds continue, he expects Bitcoin to break upward. If the Fed raises rates again, he said, concern would return that the price could fall back toward a floor in the $75,000 to $77,000 range.
There is a humorous twist in the timing. If the Fed delivers what the market is hoping for, Bitcoin could rise in the coming days, the same days on which the McRib is returning. Researchers would describe that as coincidence once more, not evidence that the theory works.
7. Why do coincidences like this look convincing?
Spurious correlations are common in any market with a long, volatile price history. If an observer tests enough calendar events, product launches or cultural moments against a price series, some of them will line up with gains purely by chance. Statisticians call this a multiple-comparisons problem: the more patterns you check, the more likely it is that one appears to work, even though none does.
A second problem is selective memory. Rallies that follow a memorable event are remembered and shared, while the occasions when the same event passed without any effect, or was followed by a decline, quietly disappear from the conversation. This is the omission that Nolan identifies when he says believers leave out the returns that do not fit. The CoinShares chart addresses it by including every U.S. return in the sample instead of the favorable ones.
A third issue is that Bitcoin's trend over any period is shaped by many simultaneous forces, including interest rates, liquidity, regulation and investor positioning. Attributing a move to one trivial event requires ruling out all of those, which nobody making the McRib claim has attempted to do.
8. How do options expiries and rate decisions affect Bitcoin?
An options expiry is the date on which derivative contracts reach their settlement. When a large amount of Bitcoin options, such as the roughly $11.69 billion due on October 30, is set to expire, traders and the market makers who sold those contracts often adjust their holdings in the days beforehand. Those adjustments can add to price swings, although the direction depends on how positions are distributed.
Interest-rate decisions work through a broader channel. When the Fed raises rates, the return on cash and government bonds rises, which can draw money away from assets that pay no income. Bitcoin pays none, so it is sensitive to expectations about policy. A hold on Wednesday, combined with continued inflows into Bitcoin funds, is the combination Koch-Gallup says would favor an upward move.
For traders, the sensible approach to a week this crowded is to separate scheduled, explainable catalysts from folklore. Position sizing, risk limits and attention to the economic calendar are the tools professionals use, and none of them depends on the menu at a fast-food chain.
The U.S. midterm elections on November 3 add another layer of uncertainty, since the result may influence expectations about future legislation and regulation affecting digital assets. None of these drivers is as entertaining as a sandwich, but each has a documented route into prices.
9. What should readers take away?
The practical lesson is that an apparent pattern needs a mechanism and a sample large enough to test it. CoinShares' comparison, with three positive outcomes in ten returns, does not meet that standard, and the strategists quoted agree there is nothing behind the claim beyond a funny overlap of dates.
It is also worth remembering that the price quoted for Bitcoin changes by the minute. The figure of $79,750 reflects the level cited when the analysis was reported, and trackers showed slightly different readings during the day. What matters for context is that Bitcoin has been range-bound, down roughly 6% in a month, and that the next few sessions contain several scheduled events that could end that stretch.
Anyone following Bitcoin this week would be better served by watching the Fed's statement, the options expiry and the election results. Those are the developments that the analysts cited here consider capable of moving prices, and they are the ones likely to determine whether Bitcoin escapes the narrow range it has held for the past month.