Mentioned in This Article
1. What did Jason Calacanis say about bitcoin?
Technology investor and podcast host Jason Calacanis used a post on X on Tuesday, October 27, to urge his followers to sell bitcoin (BTC) and move the money into artificial intelligence. He predicted that the price would drop to $57,000 within the next 12 months and that the asset would not set another all-time high. Bitcoin was changing hands at roughly $79,600 at the time, so his target implies a decline of about 28%.
The call carries extra interest because of its source. In 2023, Calacanis told founders in the crypto industry to pivot toward AI, and he is now asking holders of bitcoin to make a similar move. His message is a blunt one: the asset, in his view, has lost the momentum that once made owning it feel close to obligatory.
The post also fits a pattern in how public figures talk about markets. A prediction with a precise number and a fixed deadline is easy to remember and easy to check, which makes it more useful to readers than a vague warning. It also gives the author a clear stake in the outcome, since the claim will be measured against the actual price a year from now.
2. The argument against holding a store of value
At the center of the post is a question about purpose. Calacanis asked why anyone would devote time, energy and capital to what he called a dead network whose only function is to hold value. The phrasing reflects a long-running debate over bitcoin's role. Supporters describe it as digital gold, an asset whose fixed supply protects savings over long periods. Critics respond that an asset which mostly exists to be held does not produce anything, and that its price therefore depends on a steady stream of new buyers.
Calacanis sits firmly with the critics in this exchange. He described the year as a brutal one for bitcoin and said he would lay out his reasons for selling now. Among the signals he pointed to were continuing withdrawals from spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds, which he treats as a sign that more selling is likely to follow. He also expects the $57,000 level, which he describes as a previous low, to be tested again inside the 12-month window.
His reasoning is not only about charts and flows. It is also about attention. According to his posts, bitcoin has lost the crowd that used to make holding it feel mandatory. Investors can now ignore it without being mocked for doing so, and in his words, artificial intelligence offers more useful places to put capital. He closed the thought with a direct instruction to sell bitcoin and shift into what he called Super Intelligence.
The store-of-value argument has a long history in finance. Gold has served that role for centuries, and its defenders say its appeal comes from scarcity and widespread acceptance rather than from any cash flow. Bitcoin's supporters make the same case for a digital asset. Calacanis challenges the premise that scarcity alone is enough, arguing that capital is better used in technologies that create new products and services.
3. How do ETF outflows fit into the call?
Spot bitcoin ETFs have become one of the most closely watched sources of demand for the asset, because they let investors gain exposure through an ordinary brokerage account. When more money leaves these funds than enters them, analysts often read it as a sign that traditional investors are losing appetite. When money flows in, the opposite reading applies.
Data from Farside Investors show that bitcoin ETFs lost about $774 million across Thursday and Friday of last week. On Monday, roughly $110 million came back in. Calacanis treats the earlier outflows as a warning rather than a one-off. A single day of inflows after two days of heavy exits does not, on its face, reverse that pattern, and he reads the sequence as a prelude to additional selling.
It is worth keeping the limits of this evidence in view. Fund flows over a few sessions are a short snapshot, and they can swing quickly in either direction. They are, however, a standard indicator that market participants cite, and Calacanis leans on it to support a forecast that runs well beyond the next few days.
Exchange-traded funds also matter because of who uses them. Financial advisers, pension managers and individual savers can buy fund shares without handling private keys or opening an account at a crypto exchange. That convenience helped the funds attract large sums after they launched, so a stretch of withdrawals can say something about the mood among the more conventional investors who came to bitcoin through this route.
4. Where will the next buyers come from?
The substance of the Calacanis argument can be reduced to a question about demand. Bitcoin's long-standing investment thesis rests on the combination of a limited supply and a buyer base that keeps growing. If the supply cannot expand, any increase in demand pushes the price higher. The case works only as long as new participants keep arriving.
Calacanis questions whether that supply of newcomers still exists. He suggests that the social pressure to own bitcoin has faded and that excitement among investors has moved to AI. If that rotation is real, the pool of fresh money available to bitcoin shrinks, and the thesis of rising demand against fixed supply becomes harder to defend.
That is a forecast rather than an established fact, and the post offers no new data beyond the ETF figures and the price levels cited. Readers should treat the $57,000 number as one investor's projection, not as a calculation derived from a model. Even so, the framing is notable because it comes from someone who has spent years around both technology startups and crypto, and it speaks to the question of whether capital will favor digital assets or artificial intelligence.
The same logic applies in reverse. If excitement for AI continues to attract money, some investors may sell assets they consider less productive to fund those purchases. Whether that rotation is happening at scale is not shown by the post, and it is not possible to establish from a few days of fund data. Calacanis is making a claim about direction, and the evidence he cites is consistent with it without proving it.
5. Why does he still hold TAO?
Calacanis is not abandoning crypto altogether. He disclosed that he holds TAO, the token that powers Bittensor, a network built around artificial intelligence. Bittensor pays participants who contribute computing power, provide AI responses, supply storage and offer other services. Separate groups compete with one another to produce results that the network judges to be useful, and the token is the mechanism that rewards them.
His position is that tokens still have a place in a portfolio when they pay people to build AI. In a follow-up post on X, he wrote that he is long TAO and that he likes Bittensor's focus on scaling AI. The distinction he draws is between a token that merely stores value and a token that functions as an incentive system for productive work.
The stance is consistent with comments he made earlier in the year. In an April post on LinkedIn, he argued that crypto had left ordinary people unsure of what to do with it, while AI gave them immediate utility. He said Bittensor stood out for a specific reason: its token rewards encourage the construction of AI services, rather than leaving holders to wait for a price rise.
Bittensor is one of several projects that try to tie a crypto token to the production of AI services. Its design is meant to let contributors be paid in proportion to the usefulness of what they supply, which is the feature Calacanis highlights. He has described this as the difference between a token with a job to do and a token that sits in a wallet.
For investors, the practical point is that his position is not a blanket rejection of the sector. He is separating assets he sees as passive from those he sees as tied to activity, and he is putting his own money behind the second group. That distinction is the core of his message, and it explains why a person who is bearish on bitcoin can remain long a different token.
6. What should readers take from it?
A public prediction from a well-known investor can move sentiment even when it carries no new information. That is part of why calls like this one draw attention, whatever their eventual accuracy. The figures in the post are concrete, however: a target of $57,000, a time frame of 12 months, a starting price near $79,600 and ETF outflows of about $774 million over two days, partly offset by around $110 million of inflows on Monday.
What the post does not provide is a full account of the risks on the other side. Bitcoin's price has historically moved sharply in both directions, and forecasts over a one-year horizon have a mixed record. Calacanis also holds a position in TAO, which means his portfolio is tied to the AI theme he is recommending. Readers weighing his view should consider that overlap alongside the argument itself.
The next test will come from the same indicators he cites. Whether ETF flows turn consistently positive or negative, and whether bitcoin holds the price area it occupies now, will show whether his warning gains support or fades. His own deadline sits 12 months away, so the call can be judged against the market through to October 2027.
Anyone acting on a call like this should weigh it against their own time horizon, risk tolerance and tax situation. A forecast from a single investor is one input among many, and it does not replace an assessment of how much volatility a portfolio can absorb. The post is best read as a statement of a view and a challenge to bitcoin holders, not as a verdict on where the market will go.