Mentioned in This Article
1. Why Is Israel's Central Bank Rejecting a Crypto Sanctions Plan?
Israel's central bank has publicly rejected the idea that cryptocurrency could help the country get around international sanctions, delivering a rare rebuke over the idea of an Israel crypto sanctions workaround, aimed at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just days before the national election on Tuesday, October 27. In a statement released on Saturday, the Bank of Israel said crypto cannot be used as a way to evade sanctions imposed on the country, and urged officials to protect trade ties with Israel's main partners.
The dispute began after Netanyahu said in a television interview on Friday that Israel must prepare for the possibility of banking sanctions. He said he had asked for a plan built on crypto and blockchain networks, describing blockchain as one of the available alternatives. He did not say who was drafting the plan, which currency would be used or which network it would run on.
The exchange has quickly become a campaign issue. More than 100 economists have signed an open letter against the idea, and Netanyahu's election rivals have seized on the remarks. The episode combines three themes that rarely meet in one story: monetary policy, international pressure over the West Bank and the use of digital assets in statecraft.
2. What Netanyahu Said About Preparing for Banking Sanctions
In Friday's interview, the prime minister framed his request as contingency planning. Israel, he argued, should be ready if banks abroad were ever restricted from dealing with the country, and blockchain technology could form part of an alternative payment route. The remarks were short on specifics, and the interview gave no indication of how such a system would operate in practice or which institutions would take part.
After the central bank's response, Netanyahu said he was weighing its position but would ultimately act on what he judged to be best for the country. That answer neither confirmed nor withdrew the plan, leaving the proposal open as voters head to the polls.
The timing explains much of the attention. Opinion polls point to a possible stalemate, with neither the prime minister's coalition nor the opposition alliance on course to win an outright majority. In such a close contest, an economic proposal that draws criticism from the country's monetary authority and from prominent economists carries political weight well beyond its technical merits.
3. The Bank of Israel's Position
The Bank of Israel is the country's independent monetary authority, and public disagreements between it and a sitting prime minister are unusual. Its statement was brief but direct. Crypto, the bank said, cannot serve as a means to circumvent sanctions imposed on Israel, and the priority should be to maintain trade relations with the country's principal partners and to work on preventing sanctions from being imposed in the first place.
That emphasis on prevention is significant. Rather than debating the design of a workaround, the central bank pointed toward diplomacy and commercial relationships as the true protection against restrictions. The message was that a payment technology cannot replace the access to global finance that depends on the goodwill of trading partners.
The statement also reflects a general concern among central banks: financial stability rests on integration with the established system of correspondent banking, reserve currencies and regulated institutions. A parallel route outside that system, even if technically possible, could cost a country the confidence of the institutions it relies on for trade settlement and investment.
4. Sanctions Pressure Over the West Bank
The backdrop to the prime minister's comments is a wave of foreign pressure. The United Kingdom, France and Canada have announced or pledged trade restrictions linked to Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Those measures follow criticism of settlement expansion and of rising violence by settlers.
The restrictions described so far are trade measures tied to the settlements rather than broad financial sanctions on Israel's banking sector. Netanyahu's call for planning goes further, anticipating a harsher scenario in which the country's banks themselves could be cut off. Critics say that talking openly about such a scenario, before it has materialized, risks signaling vulnerability to investors and trading partners.
For businesses, the distinction between limited trade measures and wide financial sanctions is crucial. Targeted restrictions affect specific goods or regions, while banking sanctions can interrupt payments across an entire economy. The debate over crypto is, at its core, a debate about how seriously to treat the second possibility.
5. Economists Warn of Unemployment and Lost Investment
On Sunday, more than 100 economists signed a letter opposing the plan. Among them were Jacob Frenkel, a former governor of the Bank of Israel, and several Nobel laureates. The signatories warned that pursuing a sanctions-evasion strategy would deepen Israel's isolation, raise unemployment and lead to a collapse in foreign investment.
The letter called the idea a puzzling solution, one accepted in criminal organizations, that will not help in the slightest. The wording is notable for its bluntness, and it links a state-backed workaround to the methods of illicit actors, which is precisely the association that governments and banks seek to avoid.
The economists' concern is not limited to technical feasibility. Foreign investors and international lenders assess countries partly on their compliance with global financial rules. A government that is seen as preparing to sidestep those rules could face higher borrowing costs and lower inflows of capital, regardless of whether the workaround ever functions.
6. How Sanctions Reach a Country's Banks
To understand why the proposal worries economists, it helps to consider how financial sanctions operate. Most international trade is settled through banks that hold accounts with one another, a network known as correspondent banking, and much of it is denominated in a small number of reserve currencies. When a government or its institutions are sanctioned, foreign banks may refuse to process payments, and the affected economy loses easy access to that network.
Digital assets are often proposed as an alternative because they can move across borders without a bank. In practice, a business that is paid in crypto still needs to pay wages, taxes and suppliers in ordinary currency, and converting between the two normally requires an exchange or trading desk. Regulated platforms follow sanctions rules, and large-scale conversion into the currencies a national economy uses is difficult to hide from authorities.
This is the reasoning behind the objection that the central bank and the economists have put forward. They argue that the benefit of a blockchain route would be small, while the signal it sends to partners, rating agencies and investors could be costly. Supporters of contingency planning would reply that preparing for the worst is prudent, but so far no detail has been offered to show how the system would work.
7. Can Crypto Actually Be Used to Get Around Sanctions?
Experts say it is very difficult to do so at the scale of a national economy. Gali Ingber, head of finance studies at the College of Management Academic Studies, noted that public blockchains record every transfer, which makes transactions traceable. In her words, it is not possible to circumvent sanctions with digital currencies.
The point rests on how most blockchains work. Transactions on networks such as Bitcoin and Ethereum are visible to anyone, and specialized analytics firms and authorities can follow funds between wallets. Moving large sums outside the regulated system generally requires exchanges or other intermediaries to convert crypto into usable currency, and those intermediaries are themselves subject to sanctions rules and can be pressured to freeze funds.
Israel has direct experience with this tracing capability. In July, Defense Minister Israel Katz signed sanctions orders against 37 crypto wallets holding more than 24 million shekels, which Israel said belonged to Iran's Revolutionary Guards. Using blockchain records to identify and target wallets is the same property that would make a state-level evasion scheme hard to hide.
8. Election Rivals Seize on the Proposal
Opposition figures wasted little time. Gadi Eisenkot, Netanyahu's leading challenger, called the idea madness and described it as a BibiCoin policy that would drive companies abroad. The label, a play on the prime minister's nickname, is designed to be memorable on the campaign trail.
Opposition leader Yair Lapid compared the approach to what he called a bypass economy, likening it to the economies of Iran, Russia and Venezuela. Those countries are widely known for operating under heavy sanctions, so the comparison frames the proposal as a step toward pariah status rather than a defensive precaution.
Whether the controversy changes votes is uncertain. With polls suggesting a deadlocked result, even small shifts among undecided or economically minded voters could matter. The rapid mobilization of economists and the central bank gives the opposition an argument grounded in expertise as well as politics.
9. What Happens Next
The immediate milestone is the national election on Tuesday, October 27. The result will determine who forms the next government, and by extension whether a blockchain-based contingency plan moves forward, is quietly shelved or is overtaken by coalition negotiations.
If the proposal does advance, officials would need to answer the questions left open so far: who would design the system, which currency or token it would use, which network would carry it and how it would interact with banks and regulators. The central bank's public opposition suggests that any such effort would meet institutional resistance from the start.
For the crypto industry, the episode is a reminder that digital assets are increasingly discussed as instruments of geopolitics, but also that their transparency limits their usefulness for evading enforcement. Whatever the election outcome, the debate shows how quickly a single remark about blockchain can become a question of national economic policy.