Business

EY Urges Companies to Control Digital Wallets as Customer Relationships Shift On-Chain

EY is warning businesses that owning customer wallets, not bank accounts, will be critical to retaining users as digital assets and tokenized services reshape how value and identity are managed.

Written By :
MINRK
MINRK
EY Urges Companies

1. A Fundamental Shift in Customer Ownership

A new warning from Ernst & Young (EY) highlights a structural change underway in how companies interact with customers. As digital assets, tokenization, and blockchain-based services gain traction, EY argues that traditional bank accounts are losing their central role. Instead, control over digital wallets is emerging as the key point of contact between firms and their users.


2. Wallets Replace Accounts as the New Interface

Historically, customer relationships have been mediated through banks, payment processors, and custodians. EY suggests this model is being disrupted as wallets increasingly function as identity hubs, payment tools, and asset containers. In this environment, the wallet becomes the primary interface through which customers engage with products, services, and brands.


3. Why Control Matters for Businesses

EY’s analysis emphasizes that firms relying entirely on third-party wallets or external platforms risk losing direct access to customers. When a company does not control the wallet experience, it may also lose visibility into user behavior, transaction flows, and engagement patterns. Over time, this can weaken brand loyalty and reduce the firm’s ability to innovate or personalize services.


4. Lessons From the Platform Economy

The warning draws parallels to earlier phases of the internet economy. Companies that ceded customer relationships to dominant platforms often found themselves dependent on intermediaries for distribution and data. EY suggests that wallets represent a similar inflection point, where early control can determine long-term competitive advantage.


5. Wallets as Identity and Access Gateways

Beyond payments, wallets are increasingly tied to digital identity, credentials, and access rights. They can store tokens representing memberships, licenses, or entitlements. EY notes that as these use cases expand, wallets will govern not just how customers pay, but how they authenticate, interact, and move across digital ecosystems.


6. Tokenization Expands the Stakes

The rise of tokenized assets further elevates the importance of wallet ownership. When financial products, loyalty points, or real-world assets are issued as tokens, the wallet becomes the repository of value. Firms that issue or manage tokenized offerings may need direct wallet relationships to ensure smooth onboarding, compliance, and lifecycle management.


7. Balancing Control With User Trust

EY also acknowledges that owning the wallet experience introduces new responsibilities. Security, privacy, and user autonomy are critical considerations. Customers may resist wallets that feel overly restrictive or opaque. As a result, firms must balance control with transparency, giving users confidence that their assets and data are protected.


8. Custodial vs. Non-Custodial Trade-Offs

One of the central decisions companies face is whether to offer custodial wallets, where the firm manages private keys, or non-custodial models that give users full control. EY suggests that while custodial solutions may simplify onboarding, non-custodial designs align more closely with the decentralized ethos of digital assets. Each approach carries different regulatory and operational implications.


9. Regulatory and Compliance Pressures

Owning a wallet layer also brings regulatory complexity. Firms must consider know-your-customer requirements, data protection laws, and custody regulations that vary by jurisdiction. EY warns that companies entering this space must build compliance into wallet architecture from the outset, rather than treating it as an afterthought.


10. Competitive Risk of Standing Still

EY cautions that companies delaying wallet strategies risk being sidelined as ecosystems form around dominant wallet providers. Once customers standardize on a particular wallet, switching costs can rise. Firms that lack a direct wallet relationship may find it harder to attract users or integrate new services.


11. Industry-Wide Implications

The implications extend beyond financial services. EY notes that retail, gaming, media, and enterprise software firms are all likely to encounter wallet-driven interactions. As digital ownership models expand, wallets may underpin everything from in-game assets to subscription access and enterprise credentials.


12. Preparing for a Wallet-Centric Future

EY’s message is ultimately forward-looking. The firm argues that wallets are not a niche crypto concept, but a foundational layer of future digital commerce. Companies that invest early in wallet strategy, governance, and user experience may be better positioned to maintain customer relationships as value, identity, and interaction move increasingly on-chain.

Related Articles

NEWSLETTERS

Don't miss another story.

Subscribe to the MINRK Newsletter today.

By signing up, you will receive emails about MINRK products and you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Crypto Daybook Americas

Market analysis for crypto traders and investors.

EVERY WEEKDAY

Crypto for Advisors

Defining crypto, digital assets and the future of finance for financial advisors.

EVERY THURSDAY

The Protocol

Exploring the tech behind crypto one block at a time.

WEEKLY

Crypto Long & Short

A must read for institutions. Insights, news and analysis delivered weekly.

EVERY WEDNESDAY

CoinDesk Headlines

The biggest crypto news and ideas of the day.

EVERY WEEKDAY

State of Crypto

Examining the intersection of cryptocurrency and government.

WEEKLY

Research Reports

Join thousands of readers who rely on MINRK for data-driven insights on the latest digital asset trends.

MONTHLY