Markets•

A $1 Billion Wipeout Hit Leveraged Crypto Traders as Bitcoin Fell to $74,780

Over $1 billion in leveraged crypto bets were liquidated on November 6 as Bitcoin hit $74,780.91, its lowest since August 21, amid a tech and AI stock selloff.

Written By :MINRK
A $1 Billion Wipeout Hit Leveraged Crypto Traders as Bitcoin Fell to $74,780

Photo by Arturo Añez on Unsplash

Mentioned in This Article

BTC
BTC
Bitcoin
$75,228.00
0.65%
ETH
ETH
Ethereum
$2,142.85
4.07%
XRP
XRP
XRP
$1.12
3.34%
SOL
SOL
Solana
$87.70
1.88%

1. What happened to crypto prices on November 6?

More than $1 billion in leveraged crypto positions were forcibly closed on November 6, 2026, as Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), XRP and Solana (SOL) slid through closely watched price levels. Bitcoin touched an intraday low of $74,780.91, its weakest print since August 21, while crypto liquidations were tallied at roughly $1.05 billion over the preceding 24 hours.

The size of the wipeout drew attention for its speed as much as its scale. A widely shared post described $1 billion disappearing within about ten minutes, although the more conservative measure from derivatives data is the 24-hour total of about $1.05 billion. Different trackers count the figure slightly differently, so readings between roughly $917 million and $1.05 billion circulated during the session, all pointing to the same conclusion: a large block of leveraged bets was cleared out in a single day.

The selloff did not originate inside the crypto industry. No exchange failure, security breach or single market-moving announcement was behind the move. Instead, the pressure arrived from traditional markets, where technology and artificial intelligence stocks were being sold aggressively, and digital assets, which now trade in close sympathy with those equities, were dragged lower with them.

2. How do crypto liquidations work?

A liquidation is the forced closing of a leveraged trading position by an exchange when the trader's collateral no longer covers the losses on the trade. A trader who borrows to control a position larger than their own capital must keep a minimum amount of margin in the account. If the market moves against the position far enough, the exchange's risk engine sells the position automatically rather than allowing the account to go negative.

The mechanism matters because it is mechanical rather than discretionary. Nobody decides to sell; software does it once a price threshold is crossed. On long positions, which profit when prices rise, the forced action is a sale. That sale adds supply to the market at the very moment prices are already falling, and it can push the price down to the next cluster of liquidation levels.

This is why analysts describe such events as cascades. One group of liquidations lowers the price, the lower price triggers another group, and the sequence repeats until the leveraged positions near the current price have been exhausted. The process can turn a moderate decline into a sharp, fast one, and it often reverses just as quickly once the forced selling runs out.

3. Why were long positions hit the hardest?

Traders betting on higher prices bore the bulk of the damage. Roughly $930 million of the total, or about 88 percent, came from long positions, with the remainder from short positions that were squeezed during brief rebounds. That imbalance indicates that positioning ahead of the selloff was heavily tilted toward rising prices.

Bitcoin accounted for about $267 million of the liquidated value, and Ethereum for about $167 million. The remainder was spread across other large tokens, including XRP and Solana, which also dropped below technical support levels during the session. Larger assets tend to account for the biggest dollar figures simply because most open interest is concentrated in them, while smaller tokens often see larger percentage swings on less capital.

Concentration among long traders is a familiar feature of crypto derivatives markets. Perpetual futures contracts, the most widely traded instrument, have no expiry date and allow high leverage, which encourages traders to hold directional positions for extended periods. When prices have been range-bound or drifting higher, leverage tends to build gradually, and a sudden move in the other direction then forces many accounts out at once.

4. What triggered the selloff?

The immediate catalyst was a sharp decline in United States technology and artificial intelligence shares. Concerns about the pace of growth in AI spending and about uncertainty following the midterm elections weighed on risk appetite across markets, and investors reduced exposure to assets viewed as speculative or growth-sensitive. Crypto belongs firmly in that category in the eyes of many institutional allocators.

The link between digital assets and equities has strengthened as the investor base has changed. Spot exchange-traded funds, corporate treasuries and professional trading desks now hold or trade large amounts of crypto alongside stocks, and they often manage risk across the entire portfolio at once. When equity volatility rises, positions in digital assets are frequently reduced in tandem, which links the two markets more tightly than they were in earlier cycles.

Weak demand in the spot market added to the strain. Outflows from Bitcoin exchange-traded products, which had turned negative, removed a source of steady buying that had helped support prices earlier. With fewer buyers absorbing sales, forced liquidations had a larger effect on the price than they would have in a market with robust inflows.

5. How do exchanges handle a surge in forced selling?

Large liquidation waves test the infrastructure of trading venues. Exchanges rely on risk engines that continuously compare each account's collateral with the current mark price, and when thousands of accounts cross their thresholds within minutes, the volume of automated orders can be unusually high. Many platforms use insurance funds, which are reserves built from earlier liquidation proceeds, to cover cases in which a position is closed at a price worse than the bankruptcy level, so that profitable traders on the other side of the trade are paid in full.

If an insurance fund is insufficient, some venues use auto-deleveraging, a process that closes out profitable opposing positions to balance the books. These tools exist because crypto derivatives trade around the clock, with no circuit breakers of the type that pause trading in many stock markets. The absence of a pause is one reason that price moves in digital assets can unfold so quickly, and why a decline that begins in a distant market can reach crypto positions while traditional exchanges are closed or thinly staffed.

6. Will Bitcoin crash further?

Nothing in the data points to a certain direction from here, and the question is one of probabilities rather than predictions. A liquidation event of this size does clear a portion of excess leverage, which can leave the market less fragile afterward. Historically, sharp flushes have sometimes marked short-term lows, but they have also been followed by additional declines when the underlying driver, in this case pressure on equities, persisted.

Several conditions will shape what happens next. The first is whether technology stocks stabilize, since the crypto selloff was transmitted largely through that channel. The second is the direction of flows into Bitcoin funds, which show whether larger investors are returning or continuing to withdraw. The third is how quickly leverage rebuilds; if traders pile into new leveraged longs near current prices, the market could face another round of forced selling on any renewed drop.

Bitcoin's intraday low of $74,780.91 also gives traders a clear reference point. Technical analysts watch levels like this closely, because a decisive break below a recent low can invite further selling, while a failure to break it can encourage buyers to step back in. Neither outcome is guaranteed, and the price can move quickly in either direction when leverage is involved.

7. What does the episode say about leverage and market structure?

The main lesson from the episode is about leverage rather than about the price move itself. A decline of a few percentage points in Bitcoin is not unusual by the standards of the asset, which has repeatedly experienced larger swings in a single day. What turned this decline into a billion-dollar event was the amount of borrowed money riding on the market staying stable or rising.

For individual traders, the practical implication is familiar but frequently ignored. Higher leverage reduces the distance between the entry price and the liquidation price, so a small adverse move can eliminate an entire position. Using lower leverage, keeping extra collateral in the account and avoiding crowded trades are standard risk practices precisely because forced liquidation takes away the choice of when to exit.

For the market as a whole, the event illustrates how digital assets have become part of the broader risk complex. They no longer move independently of equities during periods of stress, and shocks that begin in technology shares can reach crypto within hours. That correlation matters for anyone who holds digital assets expecting them to behave as a hedge against traditional market declines, since on this day they behaved instead as an amplifier.

Another point worth noting is that liquidation figures themselves are estimates. Data providers collect reports from exchange feeds, and coverage varies by venue, so totals reported for the same period can differ by tens of millions of dollars. Readers comparing numbers across platforms should treat them as approximations that describe the order of magnitude of forced selling rather than an exact accounting of every closed position.

8. What to watch next

Market participants will be tracking several indicators in the coming sessions: daily liquidation totals, which show whether forced selling has ended; open interest in futures, which shows how quickly leverage is returning; and flows into spot Bitcoin funds, which reveal institutional demand. Sentiment gauges had moved toward fear after the drop, and a sustained shift in them would suggest whether the selloff is fading or deepening.

Equity markets remain the other key variable. Because the trigger for the crypto decline came from technology stocks, any further turbulence in AI-related shares would likely feed back into digital assets, while a recovery in those shares could ease the pressure. For now, the November 6 liquidation wave stands as a reminder that in leveraged markets, the speed of a decline depends as much on positioning as on the news that sets it off.

Related Articles

NEWSLETTERS

Don't miss another story.

Subscribe to the MINRK Newsletter today.

Tick the newsletters you want. No selection? You'll get MINRK Headlines.

By signing up, you will receive emails about MINRK products and you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

MINRK Daybook

Market analysis for crypto traders and investors.

EVERY WEEKDAY

MINRK for Advisors

Defining crypto, digital assets and the future of finance for financial advisors.

EVERY THURSDAY

MINRK Protocol

Exploring the tech behind crypto one block at a time.

WEEKLY

MINRK Long & Short

A must read for institutions. Insights, news and analysis delivered weekly.

EVERY WEDNESDAY

MINRK Headlines

The biggest crypto news and ideas of the day.

EVERY WEEKDAY

MINRK Policy

Examining the intersection of cryptocurrency and government.

WEEKLY

MINRK Research

Join thousands of readers who rely on MINRK for data-driven insights on the latest digital asset trends.

MONTHLY