Mentioned in This Article
1. What happened to Bitcoin on Thursday and Friday?
Bitcoin (BTC) climbed back above $76,000 on Friday, November 6, after slipping under that level during Thursday's U.S. trading session. Spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds in the United States recorded $430.2 million of net outflows on Thursday, wiping out the post-election inflow of the previous day and extending a week of net redemptions to $869.8 million.
The decline came as a sell-off in technology shares weighed on appetite for risk assets of every kind. Bitcoin had rebounded on Wednesday after the midterm elections, and Thursday's move reversed that rebound within a single session. By Friday, the price quoted on market-data pages stood near $76,060, roughly where it had been when the slide began to feel disorderly.
Friday's recovery did not erase the broader weekly loss in fund holdings, and it left open how durable the bounce would be. The distinction matters for how the episode is read. A brief dip below a round-number level that is followed by a recovery is a different signal from a decisive break, and traders were weighing which of the two Thursday represented. The fund-flow data, the stock-market backdrop and the leverage unwound in derivatives markets all pointed toward a market that was reacting to outside pressure rather than to anything specific to bitcoin itself.
2. How large were the losses across the market?
Bitcoin was down more than 5.3% over the 24 hours that preceded its recovery above $76,000. The CoinDesk 20 index, a basket that tracks the largest digital assets, fell 6.28% over the same period, which means the broader group of tokens fared somewhat worse than bitcoin did. That pattern is typical of sharp risk-off episodes: larger, more liquid assets tend to lose less than smaller ones when investors reduce exposure quickly.
Live market tickers showed the pressure was widespread. Ether (ETH) traded near $2,237, down about 7.5% on the day, while XRP (XRP) changed hands near $1.20, a decline of roughly 9.1%. Solana (SOL) was around $89.97, down about 7.1%, and Hyperliquid's HYPE token was near $77.83, about 6.8% lower. Those figures are snapshots that move continuously, but they illustrate that the sell-off reached well beyond a single coin.
For readers who track only the headline price, the spread between assets is a useful reminder. Bitcoin's 5% decline looked severe on its own, yet several large tokens lost more, and the index covering the whole group fell by more than bitcoin did. The market was not rotating from one asset into another; it was shrinking exposure across the board.
3. Why did U.S. bitcoin ETFs see $430 million in outflows?
U.S.-listed spot bitcoin ETFs lost a net $430.2 million on Thursday, according to flow data compiled by SoSoValue. A spot bitcoin ETF is a fund that holds actual bitcoin and issues shares that trade on a stock exchange, so net outflows mean that more shares were redeemed than were created during the day, and that the funds' managers had to deliver cash to departing investors.
Fidelity's Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) accounted for the largest share of the withdrawals, with $199.9 million leaving the product. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) followed with $105 million. Together the two funds represented about $305 million of the day's total, which leaves roughly $125 million spread across the other products in the category.
The reversal was sharp because the previous session had gone the other way. On Wednesday the funds took in a net $74.6 million as bitcoin rebounded after the election. Thursday's outflows were nearly six times that amount, so the single day more than cancelled the inflow that had come before it. Counting the full week through Thursday, net redemptions reached $869.8 million.
Fund flows are often read as a gauge of how conventional investors, such as advisers and institutions that use brokerage accounts, feel about bitcoin. A week that ends with nearly $870 million withdrawn suggests that those buyers were stepping back while stock markets were falling, instead of treating the dip as an entry point.
4. What triggered the tech sell-off behind the move?
The crypto decline followed a steep fall in U.S. equities on Thursday. The Nasdaq dropped 5.5% and the S&P 500 lost 4.3%, a pair of moves large enough to be treated as a rout rather than routine volatility. Bitcoin has frequently moved in the same direction as technology shares during periods of stress, and Thursday was an example of that link.
Analysts at FalconX and GSR tied the sell-off to a specific worry: that a Democratic sweep in the midterm elections could slow the construction of data centers for artificial intelligence. Spending on that infrastructure has been a central driver of technology valuations, and any hint that it might be curtailed raises the question of whether the enormous sums already committed will earn an adequate return.
The explanation is an interpretation offered by market participants rather than a measured cause, and the analysts framed it as a concern, not as a settled outcome. Still, it shows why a political result that might seem remote from digital assets could feed through to them. When investors reassess a theme that has lifted the whole technology sector, assets that trade alongside that sector are repriced as well.
5. How much leverage was forced out of the market?
Forced selling made the slide steeper. According to CoinGlass, about $1.26 billion in leveraged crypto positions were liquidated over 24 hours, and $1.12 billion of that total came from long positions, which are bets that prices will rise. In other words, about 89% of the liquidations hit traders who had expected higher prices.
A liquidation happens when a trader borrows to enlarge a position and the market moves far enough against it that the exchange closes the position automatically to protect itself. Those closures are executed as market orders, which adds selling pressure at the moment prices are already falling. That in turn can trigger further liquidations, a feedback loop that can push prices below where they would settle without leverage.
The scale of the long liquidations explains part of why Thursday's drop felt abrupt. Traders positioned for a continued rebound after the election were caught on the wrong side of a move driven by the stock market, and the automatic unwinding of their positions compounded the decline.
6. What do analysts say about the spillover from stocks?
Simon-Peter Massabni, head of business development at the broker XS.com, said in emailed comments that the rout in equities was spilling over into crypto. He said asset managers were selling alternative holdings to meet margin calls and reduce leverage, describing the process as the need to "liquidate alternative holdings to meet margin calls and deleverage portfolios."
A margin call is a demand from a lender or broker for additional collateral when the value of a portfolio falls. Investors who cannot post more collateral must sell assets, and they often sell whatever is most liquid and easiest to exit, not necessarily what they like least. Bitcoin, which trades around the clock and carries deep liquidity, can be among the first holdings to go.
That mechanism would help account for the way bitcoin fell alongside shares even though the reasons for owning it differ from the reasons for owning technology stocks. Selling driven by margin requirements is indifferent to an asset's long-term merits; it responds to the need for cash.
7. Was Wednesday's rebound ever on solid footing?
The rebound that preceded Thursday's drop already showed signs of fragility. Open interest in bitcoin futures, which measures the value of outstanding contracts, stayed roughly flat during Wednesday's rise. Fresh leveraged buying usually expands open interest, so a flat reading suggested that new money was not rushing in to support the move.
Bitcoin also traded at a discount on Coinbase compared with Binance. Coinbase is widely used by U.S. customers, so a lower price there relative to a large international venue is commonly interpreted as a sign of subdued buying demand in the United States. That reading is consistent with the ETF figures, since the funds are also a channel for U.S. demand.
Taken together, flat futures positioning, a discount on a U.S.-focused exchange and a week of fund redemptions describe a market in which participation was thin when the stock market turned lower. A recovery on Friday restored the $76,000 level but did not by itself change that picture.
8. What should investors watch next?
The first thing to monitor is whether the ETF flow data turns positive again. A return to net inflows on the days after Friday's recovery would indicate that conventional investors were treating the pullback as an opportunity, while continued redemptions would point to sustained caution. The funds publish daily figures, so the answer will become visible within days.
The second is the direction of technology shares. Because analysts linked the crypto decline to concern over AI data-center spending, further volatility in the Nasdaq and the S&P 500 could carry over to digital assets, and a stabilization in equities could give bitcoin room to hold its gains. The third is leverage: with $1.12 billion of long positions already cleared, the market has less forced selling left to unwind at current levels, though new leverage can build quickly if prices rise.
For now, the key facts are straightforward. Bitcoin lost more than 5% in a day, regained $76,000 on Friday, and saw its spot ETFs lose $430.2 million in a single session. Whether the recovery proves durable depends less on bitcoin-specific news than on the equity market that dragged it lower.